Team Performance Challenges Faced by Fast-Moving Silicon Valley Companies (Part Two)
Part One of this two-part series illustrated two common challenges faced by Silicon Valley firms. In Part Two, we explore additional challenges and solutions to the building high-performing teams.
Challenge #3: A Sense of Disconnect
When a team’s common vision and purpose are diluted, team members have difficulty sustaining a connection to the team. This sense of disconnect is compounded when teams are virtual.
Silicon Valley has fostered one of the most competitive markets of our time. Teams often move so fast that it is considered “bad form” to slow down to consider where the team has been and where it needs to go next. Instead, what often takes place is a very abbreviated and “on the fly” form of delegation and information dissemination deemed necessary by the Project Leads.
This unspoken culture of “need-to-know basis” thinking results in overall team member disconnect. When team members begin to show lack of commitment, evidenced by a waning sense of urgency, and project tasks increasingly slipping lower on the priority list, it becomes evident that team member disconnect has taken hold.
When addressed early enough, the damaging effects of team member disconnect can be mitigated and quite often reversed. However, the structure of virtual teams does not always lend itself to identifying the signs and symptoms of a disconnected team member. As a result, if allowed to remain in that place for an extended period, a team member can be tempted to find ways to justify and cope with the uncomfortable and counterproductive state of isolation from the rest of the team.
Challenge #4: Deteriorating Loyalty
When people cannot change their conditions, it is human nature to tap coping mechanisms that allow them to accept the status quo and survive.
However, surviving and thriving are very different experiential states of being. When team members thrive, and their basic organizational needs are met, they are more likely to look beyond their own immediate concerns, focusing instead on the larger team and organization with which they identify. When our emotional needs are met, it is easier to connect with our sense of “place” in the grand scheme of things, and to quantify the value we bring to the process. We thrive when others recognize and validate our contributions.
Surviving, on the other hand, involves focusing energy inward to overcome a present threat or danger. Some might consider this a very “self-serving” act, and they would be correct. There is no room for altruism when all of one’s energies are going into the simple act of survival – it is our innate defense mechanism at work.
When a team member is in a state of survival, their team’s chances for success decreases substantially and can result in heavy attrition and/or turnover among members. This only perpetuates the unhealthy cycle, and compounds its impact each time the team goes through the process. Still not convinced that any of these challenges are relevant to you and your team? Well, then consider this sobering fact: according to an April 15, 2002, article in the Gallup Management Journal, actively disengaged workers cost the American economy up to an estimated $350 billion per year.
But not all is doom and gloom. There are ways to avoid the damaging effects of these challenges.
What are Proactive Companies Doing? Some Possible Solutions
Prevention requires far less energy and resources than treating symptoms. Before an organization embarks on the process of building a virtual collaborative team, it should be very clear on the purpose of that team’s existence - its mission, values, end goals, and possible timelines. Once the team’s purpose and mission are tightly defined, then the search for members should intrinsically include an assessment of whether or not they are in direct alignment with the candidates’ own personal values.
In the end, it is more valuable to have a team member two oceans away already aligned with the greater team mission than a team member in the next cubicle who must be “sold” on the ideas.
The concept of virtual teams, although common in Silicon Valley, still has areas of ambiguity. One challenge is the tendency for some companies to doubt that a team can truly be a team if its members are separated by an ocean, a time zone, or a single building. To assuage this concern, team leaders must make every effort to include regular human interaction among members. Even video conferencing once in a while will have a markedly positive impact.
Whenever possible, pull team members together in one space, if for no other reason than to focus on relationships between them. We are continually amazed at the positive residual effects client companies experience after conducting simple annual gatherings for virtual teams at the corporate offices.
If you want to periodically give your virtual teams a routine “check-up”, refer to our Team Performance Center Baker’s Dozen: The Characteristics of High Performance Teams. Each one if these characteristics can be addressed individually and integrated back into the culture of any team, be it on a single playing field or dispersed over five continents.